Thursday, April 13, 2006

Here's a little suggestion.

Zacarias Moussaoui is the Islamic sicko who admits being involved in the plot to attack the Twin Towers on September 11th. Moussaoui is on trial for his role in the genocide. He admits he was involved. He admits that he is not sorry. In fact he said he wished more people had suffered. It appears that he thinks his god wants that to happen.

He says that he wished more attacks on taken place on "September 12, September 13, September 14." During the course of the trial he exhibited open satisfaction of the deaths that he helped plan. Originally he said the "greatest jihad in Islam is to speak the truth in front of the tyrant and be executed for it." But when it got to the point that he could see that he might get his wish he had a sudden revelation that his death might violate Islamic beliefs.

But at the same time he has done his best to insult family members of the people who died when they were in the court room. And he appears to be pushing the jury to give him the death penalty. I'm pretty much against the death penalty but can be persuaded to make exceptions.

In this case I wouldn't mind if Mr. Moussaoui is sent to the here after. I think the judge ought to give him his wish. But I think Mr. Moussaoui deserves to suffer. But I think he ought to suffer according to his own beliefs. Now I am not suggesting torture or anything like that. How about something that will cause him to torment himself because of the nonsense he believes?

In this case my modest proposal would be that they inform this lunatic that he will be executed. But he should be made aware that before the needle is inserted he will be wrapped in the carcas of a dead pig. He will die inside the carcas of the pig and he will be buried inside the carcas of the pig. Let him figure out how he's going to get into paradise with a porkophobic Allah. And starting about two weeks before the execution I suggest he only be given bacon, ham, pork chops, sausages and the like for his meals. His beliefs are not worthy of respect because he is not worthy of respect. In fact I suggest serious research be done to find as many ways as possible to make him unclean. And it ought to be made known that anyone who engages in such attacks will be executed in a similar manner.


Blogger Einzige said...

I like this idea!

April 14, 2006

Blogger oscar wilde said...

You surprise me with this, sounds like the ravings of a fundamentalist.

April 16, 2006

Blogger GodlessZone said...

Oscar: Please note that the suggestion itself does no violence. Wrapping a dead pig around a dead body is not an act of violence. But consider when this was supposedly done in history. At a time when some Islamic based violence was happening in the Phillippines (and perhaps this is invented history but the concept is intersting) a general there was unable to put an end to the violence. But when one such violent individual was executed he had them buried in this manner and publicized the case. And supposedly that put an immediate end to attacks. One reason such a thing may work is that it uses the root of the individuals own malevolent ideology against himself. These individuals don't worry about death because they have the fantasy that there is life after death. This simple action removes that assurance from them. As they are ritually unclean they could not possily enter pradise and it is the assurance of paradise (in their own minds) that allows them to act like monsters. I am simply looking for the least intrusive means of ending such attacks. And if something this minor would work then it preferable to the armed invasions that kill innocent people the process.

April 16, 2006

Blogger oscar wilde said...

I recognize your point, however I find it a little odd that you go down this emotional path.
I have enjoyed all I have read, this apart.
Your ability to put your point across without drifting into flambouyant rhetoric makes for refreshing reading.
The basic of this overall problem is not confined to the islamists, as with the christers and all other religions of "Reward" it seams to matter little to the practitioners what they practice on earth as long as they think they will end up in the utopia of the sky.
It is this conception that quiet frankly pisses me off no end.
The aetheist is much maligned, particularly so by the christers, but our actions here on earth, hopefuly for most part good, are done out of basic civilized ethics, and for that reason only.
We don't need a reward.
Thanks for the reply, I look forward to your future posts.
Best regards, Oscar.

April 16, 2006

Blogger Tinet said...

That thing about pork preventing Muslims from entering Heaven is not true. ( So you'd have to figure out something else.

April 10, 2007


Post a Comment

<< Home


Web Counters Religion Blog Top Sites